MORE: http://www.hiddensecretsofmoney.com This week we have a preview of Episode 4 of Mike Maloney’s Hidden Secrets Of Money. In this short section – we disc…
Video Rating: 4 / 5
The European debt crisis explained: The debt levels around the globe are unprecedented in peacetime. The odds of restructurings and/or defaults are higher th…
Video Rating: 0 / 5
Don’t you get it? I hope you do. Once you realize the truth of our
situation, you had better take action. Do not give up. There are steps to
keep your family warm, fed, and safe!
It’s suspiciously simplistic concept, but issuing money as a debt indeed is
a joke, it’s an infinite bonus for the bankers as demand for money supply
is ever-increasing as productivity grows.
I don’t understand this concept. Not all of currencies being circulated in
the economy is borrowed into existence. If the economy grows (which is not
hence the problem) then deficit and the debt will shrink.
Imagine if this system was reversed and there were $2 in existence for
every $1 interest. That system would be fair and in favour of enteprise and
production rather than speculation and usery. ie you would make money by
doing something with money rather than just printing it and loaning it out.
Most people would be wealthy.
Ok, I’ll watch it.
Nobody here wants to go back to a gold standard. Watch Episode 3.
Going back to a purely a 1 to 1 ratio gold system is fantasy at this day
and age. In the information age and automation age, this will never work.
Machines can produce everything in abundance in mining, farming,
manufacturing, scientific research, industrial design, you are talking
about regression. You people who want to go back to a purely a gold
standard are dreamers!
That’s gold-backed currency, not a gold system.
When we had the gold system, we had inflation, because of reserve
fractional banking. No system is really perfect. Under this current
monetary system where money isn’t backed by gold, it would be perfect if
more stuff was produced in the USA.
You can buy anything in this world with that currency, so it is money. You
can buy precious metals, precious stones, automobiles, homes, jewelry,
food, electronics, furniture, etc. Money can be anything, it can be sea
shells, silver coins, crops, bronze coins, copper coins, nickel coins, gold
coins, paper, and now it is digits.
“Currency”, not “money”.
The people who came up with this are not retards, they’re actually quite
genius, albeit greedy as f**k. They basically convinced people that it’s OK
for them(the Fed) to counterfeit money–but NOT ok for anyone else to
counterfeit. Those are Grade A thieves right there.
It is a fake problem! Money paid as interest is returning to the economy as
bank emploee salaries and shareholders dividends.
If what Mr. Maloney is saying is true…. They can keep raising the debt
ceiling to infinity, but there will always be more debt than the money to
pay it. The people who will pay for it would be the avg Joe/Jane, who are
heavily indebted with car loans, home loans, credit card debts, etc. In
addition, most of their investments are tied to the financial system which
is tied to debt. If they keep this going, we will gradually see inflation,
and the average people will pay for it with higher prices
@Cregg Lund – when you borrow the second dollar it has interest too. its
never 1-to-1. You can never create a dollar without interest.
what is next? civil war in America !
If all these is impossible then who are the retards who started or agrred
on loaning money whick can never be paid up.
You can’t pay them back. That’s the point. There’s only one dollar in
existence, but you owe them two.
This is why America is fucked.
Wait a minute… if I borrow the first dollar into existence and promise to
pay it back plus another dollar, then when I do pay them back, there are
only 2 dollars in existence, not three; therefore, it is a 1-to-1
correlation and not 2-to-1 as your animation depicts.
The whole issue with the borrow theory is there is a relationship between
goods/services and the amount of notes (dollars and bonds) at any time.
Just as there is a relatonaship between ggod of one type and those of
another type. Like oil and food. or manufactured goods and transport.
Relationships are the only way humans have of comparing goods and services
to each other. Curency is government created thng to facilitate exchange,
compare goods/services, store wealth ant allow easier taxation.
What the article misses out is the other side of the economy. i.e. goods
and services. It’s easy to forma theory if it misses out a whole side of
reality. Like – I could fly if I flapped my hands. – that’s a good theory
since There would be lift to support me! True . – But I will leave out
gravity because that means my theory is not workable in reality.
What is true about the theory is politicians don’t want it to colapse on
their watch because the Reality would reveal itself they would look stupid
and greedy!! That’s the reality . But the money system is not inherreently
faulted if it ithe relationship between new money creation and an increase
in GDP is maintained at a consistent level. Only stupid greedy politicians
stand in the way.
How will the US use military to get creditors to loan them money? How will
it pay the military when it doesn’t have any money? These are questions I
ask…
Don’t you get it? I hope you do. Once you realize the truth of our
situation, you had better take action. Do not give up. There are steps to
keep your family warm, fed, and safe!
It’s suspiciously simplistic concept, but issuing money as a debt indeed is
a joke, it’s an infinite bonus for the bankers as demand for money supply
is ever-increasing as productivity grows.
I don’t understand this concept. Not all of currencies being circulated in
the economy is borrowed into existence. If the economy grows (which is not
hence the problem) then deficit and the debt will shrink.
Imagine if this system was reversed and there were $2 in existence for
every $1 interest. That system would be fair and in favour of enteprise and
production rather than speculation and usery. ie you would make money by
doing something with money rather than just printing it and loaning it out.
Most people would be wealthy.
Ok, I’ll watch it.
Nobody here wants to go back to a gold standard. Watch Episode 3.
Going back to a purely a 1 to 1 ratio gold system is fantasy at this day
and age. In the information age and automation age, this will never work.
Machines can produce everything in abundance in mining, farming,
manufacturing, scientific research, industrial design, you are talking
about regression. You people who want to go back to a purely a gold
standard are dreamers!
That’s gold-backed currency, not a gold system.
When we had the gold system, we had inflation, because of reserve
fractional banking. No system is really perfect. Under this current
monetary system where money isn’t backed by gold, it would be perfect if
more stuff was produced in the USA.
You can buy anything in this world with that currency, so it is money. You
can buy precious metals, precious stones, automobiles, homes, jewelry,
food, electronics, furniture, etc. Money can be anything, it can be sea
shells, silver coins, crops, bronze coins, copper coins, nickel coins, gold
coins, paper, and now it is digits.
“Currency”, not “money”.
The people who came up with this are not retards, they’re actually quite
genius, albeit greedy as f**k. They basically convinced people that it’s OK
for them(the Fed) to counterfeit money–but NOT ok for anyone else to
counterfeit. Those are Grade A thieves right there.
It is a fake problem! Money paid as interest is returning to the economy as
bank emploee salaries and shareholders dividends.
If what Mr. Maloney is saying is true…. They can keep raising the debt
ceiling to infinity, but there will always be more debt than the money to
pay it. The people who will pay for it would be the avg Joe/Jane, who are
heavily indebted with car loans, home loans, credit card debts, etc. In
addition, most of their investments are tied to the financial system which
is tied to debt. If they keep this going, we will gradually see inflation,
and the average people will pay for it with higher prices
@Cregg Lund – when you borrow the second dollar it has interest too. its
never 1-to-1. You can never create a dollar without interest.
what is next? civil war in America !
If all these is impossible then who are the retards who started or agrred
on loaning money whick can never be paid up.
You can’t pay them back. That’s the point. There’s only one dollar in
existence, but you owe them two.
This is why America is fucked.
Wait a minute… if I borrow the first dollar into existence and promise to
pay it back plus another dollar, then when I do pay them back, there are
only 2 dollars in existence, not three; therefore, it is a 1-to-1
correlation and not 2-to-1 as your animation depicts.
The whole issue with the borrow theory is there is a relationship between
goods/services and the amount of notes (dollars and bonds) at any time.
Just as there is a relatonaship between ggod of one type and those of
another type. Like oil and food. or manufactured goods and transport.
Relationships are the only way humans have of comparing goods and services
to each other. Curency is government created thng to facilitate exchange,
compare goods/services, store wealth ant allow easier taxation.
What the article misses out is the other side of the economy. i.e. goods
and services. It’s easy to forma theory if it misses out a whole side of
reality. Like – I could fly if I flapped my hands. – that’s a good theory
since There would be lift to support me! True . – But I will leave out
gravity because that means my theory is not workable in reality.
What is true about the theory is politicians don’t want it to colapse on
their watch because the Reality would reveal itself they would look stupid
and greedy!! That’s the reality . But the money system is not inherreently
faulted if it ithe relationship between new money creation and an increase
in GDP is maintained at a consistent level. Only stupid greedy politicians
stand in the way.
How will the US use military to get creditors to loan them money? How will
it pay the military when it doesn’t have any money? These are questions I
ask…
evacuation@louvers.elisabeth” rel=”nofollow”>.…
tnx….
biologic@cox.uniting” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ….
ebb@gesualdo.alleghenies” rel=”nofollow”>.…
ñïñ çà èíôó!…
repeated@synonyms.indicated” rel=”nofollow”>.…
good info!…